← Back to Dashboard

Fleetwood—Port Kells — Election Outlook & Projection

British Columbia Safe Liberal Margin: 20pts Win probability: >99% (LPC) Last updated: 2026-09-14 Open in the interactive dashboard →

Where this riding stands

The RidingWatch model currently projects the Liberals at 53% in Fleetwood—Port Kells, 20 points ahead of the Conservatives at 33%, with the NDP at 11%, the Greens at 3%. Across 10,000 simulations the seat goes to the Liberals in >99% of them. The simulations put the Liberals' share anywhere from 47% to 59%, and the Conservatives' from 27% to 39%.

In April 2025 the Liberals won here with 48%, 4 points ahead of the Conservatives. The Liberals also held it in 2021. Compared with the 2025 result, the current projection has the Conservatives down 11, the Liberals up 5, the NDP up 5 points. These shifts come from the national polling swing applied to this riding's past results — not from riding-level polling, which the model does not have.

The sitting member is Gurbux Saini (Liberal), MP since 2025.

Rating: Safe Liberal — the Liberals lead by a margin the model treats as decisive on current polling. In practical terms, a 20-point projected margin is wider than the swings the model produces in most ridings; a different result would need a local shift that national polling doesn't currently show. No other party is within 10 points of the lead on these numbers, though the Conservatives at 33% clear the model's 15% viability floor. Every vote counts toward a party's national total regardless of the local outcome. The Strategic Voting Assistant below shows how these standings look for a specific goal, including simply voting for your first choice.

Sitting member

GSai
Gurbux Saini
Liberal
MP since 2025

About this riding

Located in central Surrey, this riding represents a suburban Metro Vancouver community undergoing residential intensification. Fleetwood and Port Kells neighbourhoods feature primarily residential development with supporting commercial zones. The area sits within Surrey's broader suburban expanse. Transportation corridors, including major highways, traverse the riding. The landscape is predominantly developed suburban terrain with limited natural features. Population density and commuter patterns define the area's character.

Projected Vote Share — Next Federal Election

Liberal
53%
+5
Conservative
33%
-11
NDP
11%
+5
Green
3%
+2.1

Projected using a blended proportional-uniform swing model with incumbency adjustments. Based on the current national polling average and regional crosstabs as of 2026-09-14.

Vote-share trend

0%15%30%45%60%45%48%53%31%44%33%19%6%11%2%0.9%3%2021 result2025 resultProjection

2021 and 2025 are official results for this riding; the third point is the current model projection. No estimated historical points are shown.

2025 Election Results vs. Current Projection

Party2025 Vote %Projected %Change
Liberal48%53%+5
Conservative44%33%-11
NDP6%11%+5
Green0.9%3%+2.1

Strategic Voting Assistant

Reasoning uses the current projected shares for this riding. Viability = within 10 points of the leader or at least 15%.

Explore More Ridings

About the Model

This projection is generated by the RidingWatch statistical model, which combines national polling data with historical election results to estimate vote shares and likely outcomes in each of Canada's 343 federal ridings.

The model begins with a weighted blend of results from the 2025 and 2021 federal elections, then applies the polling swing to each riding using a mostly-uniform (90/10 uniform/proportional) swing method — the national swing, adjusted by the province's pooled deviation where pollsters publish regional crosstabs. No pollster house effects are applied. Incumbency is not assumed: only first-term MPs (+1) and party leaders (+2) receive an adjustment. Uncertainty is estimated through 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations with correlated regional errors.

Projections are updated as new polling data becomes available. All estimates are probabilistic — they represent the most likely outcome given current information, not a guarantee of any result. Actual election outcomes depend on factors the model cannot fully capture, including local campaigns, turnout variation, and late-breaking events.