← Back to Dashboard

Long Range Mountains — Election Outlook & Projection

Newfoundland and Labrador Likely Liberal Margin: 7pts Win probability: 87% (LPC) Last updated: 2026-09-14 Open in the interactive dashboard →

Where this riding stands

The RidingWatch model currently projects the Liberals at 49% in Long Range Mountains, 7 points ahead of the Conservatives at 42%, with the NDP at 8%. Across 10,000 simulations the seat goes to the Liberals in 87% of them, the Conservatives in 13%. The simulations put the Liberals' share anywhere from 42% to 55%, and the Conservatives' from 36% to 48%.

In April 2025 the Conservatives won here with 50%, 7 points ahead of the Liberals. That was a change from 2021, when the Liberals took the seat. Compared with the 2025 result, the current projection has the Conservatives down 8, the Liberals up 6, the NDP up 4 points. These shifts come from the national polling swing applied to this riding's past results — not from riding-level polling, which the model does not have.

The sitting member is Carol Anstey (Conservative), MP since 2025.

Rating: Likely Liberal — the Liberals are ahead in most simulations. In practical terms, the Liberals are ahead in most simulations, but the Conservatives win in 13% of them — the outcome is probable, not fixed. Within 10 points of the lead: the Conservatives (42%). Every vote counts toward a party's national total regardless of the local outcome. The Strategic Voting Assistant below shows how these standings look for a specific goal, including simply voting for your first choice.

Sitting member

CA
Carol Anstey
Conservative
MP since 2025

About this riding

Located in western Newfoundland, this riding encompasses areas inland from the west coast, including portions of the Long Range Mountains and surrounding communities. Gros Morne National Park anchors the region's growing tourism economy. The area combines fishing and forestry traditions with expanding recreational and ecotourism development. The landscape features dramatic mountain terrain, river valleys, and coastal regions. Communities are modest in size but benefit from proximity to major natural attractions. The riding reflects Newfoundland's western geographic character and increasingly tourism-oriented economy. Natural beauty and protected areas shape regional development and identity.

Projected Vote Share — Next Federal Election

Liberal
49%
+6
Conservative
42%
-8
NDP
8%
+4
Green
1%
+1

Projected using a blended proportional-uniform swing model with incumbency adjustments. Based on the current national polling average and regional crosstabs as of 2026-09-14.

Vote-share trend

0%13%25%38%50%44%43%49%39%50%42%12%4%8%2021 result2025 resultProjection

2021 and 2025 are official results for this riding; the third point is the current model projection. No estimated historical points are shown.

2025 Election Results vs. Current Projection

Party2025 Vote %Projected %Change
Liberal43%49%+6
Conservative50%42%-8
NDP4%8%+4
Green0%1%+1

Strategic Voting Assistant

Reasoning uses the current projected shares for this riding. Viability = within 10 points of the leader or at least 15%.

Explore More Ridings

Newfoundland and Labrador Ridings (by competitiveness)
Central Newfoundland Terra Nova—The Peninsulas Labrador Avalon St. John's East

About the Model

This projection is generated by the RidingWatch statistical model, which combines national polling data with historical election results to estimate vote shares and likely outcomes in each of Canada's 343 federal ridings.

The model begins with a weighted blend of results from the 2025 and 2021 federal elections, then applies the polling swing to each riding using a mostly-uniform (90/10 uniform/proportional) swing method — the national swing, adjusted by the province's pooled deviation where pollsters publish regional crosstabs. No pollster house effects are applied. Incumbency is not assumed: only first-term MPs (+1) and party leaders (+2) receive an adjustment. Uncertainty is estimated through 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations with correlated regional errors.

Projections are updated as new polling data becomes available. All estimates are probabilistic — they represent the most likely outcome given current information, not a guarantee of any result. Actual election outcomes depend on factors the model cannot fully capture, including local campaigns, turnout variation, and late-breaking events.